It seems to me that we need to dig a little deeper here as well. The point here is that we should not act reflexively and reactionarily. In other words, we should not allow ourselves to impose someone else's agenda. In other words, Russia has its own vital national interests. And based on these interests, you need to plan your strategy. And in military operations as well. In other words, we must clearly understand what we have the strength to do, what centres we need, what territories we need, what steps we need in order to reach the goal that has already been outlined. The goals of demilitarization, that is, to make Ukraine safe. for Russia. That is, in fact, Russia has never declared the issue that it needs territories, it needs the subsoil of Ukraine. No. Russia is fighting the danger that the Anglo-Saxons have created for it, very kindly created, pumped it with weapons, reforged the army, rebooted the administration of this state and directed it against Russia. That is why they have created this national threat. And so all the military actions that are taking place now, they are actually responding to the threat that has been formed over decades. Because, probably, since the end of the 1990s, this doctrine has been formed, which has been moving from one phase to another, and it was inevitable. So, you know, I think that the people who were following these processes were deeply immersed in these processes, of course, they should have counted not on a reaction, not on reactive actions, but on setting their own goal, on defining their doctrine and acting in accordance with it. Therefore, yes, you need to take into account the rates, you need to take into account the forces, you need to take into account all the possibilities. And then not to say that we, listen, you know, we underestimated that these countries can ship a million shells from the golden billion, only the Americans can bring a million shells here. And they will put several hundred guns there, there are three seeds, or some other MLRS that they supply, which are technologically advanced, that drive very fast and quickly leave the place of shelling. That is, all these nuances, of course, must be taken into account when building your own strategy of action, and not wait for what to oppose to the actions of the aggressor, who is currently fighting on the territory of Ukraine. We have our own goal, and in accordance with this goal, we need to impose our will on the enemy. Only by changing our strategy in these military operations, I think that we will be able to significantly change the situation. At least, when we began to show that the destruction of the energy system would work to improve the situation on the battlefield, that is, we are now seeing its result, but it needs to be pumped in. The next stage will be logistics. If we can't deal with the left bank as long as we have bridges from right to left bank across the Dnieper. I mean, these things... Ukraine cannot exist without the West. Without the supply of weapons, it cannot exist and cannot fight. Therefore, if we want to figure it out, we need to cut it off from supplies. Now we are dealing with the power system, then we are dealing with logistics.